<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:35:30 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog</title><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Happy Independence Day...</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/7/4/happy-independence-day.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1966680</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Hope everyone has a happy and safe 4th of July. Please note that due to the Holiday the podcast won't be available until monday night. </p><p>Take Care all,<br />Jeff&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1966680.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>UFOlogy: The Ultimate Disinformation Agent</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:16:07 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/7/3/ufology-the-ultimate-disinformation-agent.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1964962</guid><description><![CDATA[<span class="full-image-float-right"><img src="http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/storage/sitefiles/pickles.jpg" alt="pickles.jpg" /></span><br /><div align="justify" style="text-align: justify;"> More and more these days I have to laugh (or I'll cry) about how many issues related to UFOs are sensationalized, misreported and embellished for no other reason than to fill a theory, or to try and elicit some sort of &quot;wow&quot; factor from the public.</div><br /> <br /> Here's a great example: Alfred Webre of Exopolitics Radio, on a recent broadcast with of all people Steven Greer (another polluter of the UFO subject ) made the statement that the O'Hare Airport sighting was of a &quot;20-60 mile wide craft&quot;.<br /> <br /> Uh, what?<br /> <br /> <div align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">Needless to say this gets my blood boiling. As someone involved in the case from the very beginning of it's public awareness, I can tell you that no witness I spoke with ever said that the observed craft was 20-60 miles in size. It's complete nonsense, and Webre does nothing but confuse the issue and put out (whether accidental or intentional) misinformation. Now, anyone familiar with the case would identify this as being completely inaccurate, but unfortunately many less familiar with it will repeat this same &quot;fact&quot;. And eventually, among some of the interested UFO public, this will become a debated part of the case. Mark my words.<br /> <br /> It's not the first time, and it won't be the last. This kind of disorganization and blatant embellishment is why I find such amusement in the idea that &quot;the government&quot; sends out disinformation agents to tar and feather the UFO subject. While I don't doubt that in some shape or form this has happened, UFOlogy needs little help in discrediting itself.<br /> <br /> Recently at the last X-Conference, organizer Stephen Bassett made the statement that the entire UFO/alien issue was &quot;extraterrestrial&quot;, and as he pounded his fist in exclamation, called that information &quot;confirmed&quot;, among other solidifying descriptions.</div><br /> <br /> I don't mind saying that my brain was screaming in my skull, that a man who has elevated himself in this field to be considered by some to be influential, would make such a claim in front of all the lecturers and crowd (and I assume some press) without so much as blinking. As far as I'm concerned it's one of the most ridiculous things I have ever witnessed.<br /> <br /> <p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">I like Stephen, and I think his heart is in the right place, all things considered (even though I view disclosure as a bit naive when you really think about it), but in my opinion this was an entirely irresponsible statement. Without solid data to support that &quot;fact&quot; (and I don't mean &quot;Greeresque&quot; data - the kind you're told about but can't see or review...most likely because it doesn't exist), you're blowing huge, sensationalized smoke clouds and making a joke of this subject, and unfortunately in the public eye, all of us involved.</p><p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">The ETH is just that - a theory, and as of yet an unproven one. There are possibilities far beyond extraterrestrials... and I'm sure some we haven't even thought of yet. To claim otherwise is not only ridiculously premature, but ultimately irresponsible. It burns me up when I hear such statements, especially by those who have elevated themselves in stature within this loosely knit community of study.<br /> <br /> Now, ask yourself how many people were shifted in thought as to the origins of the enigma after Bassett's remark. Two maybe? No big deal right? Not until those two or three become a few hundred... and so it goes.</p><p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">Turns out Bassett is also apparently giving the &quot;thumbs up&quot; to Jeff Peckman. The man who sells the &quot;Metatron Harmonizer&quot;, another meaningless New Age trinket he claims will &quot;Allow you to be more comfortable in your daily life&quot; and&nbsp; &quot;Allow you to be more comfortable in challenging situations&quot;, among many other claims including that it'll make your electronic equipment run cooler. In short, it's a small credit card style thing with a metal chip in it...oh yeah, it's also 150 bucks.<br /></p><p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">You're kidding me right? This is the kind of guy (Peckman) who inserts himself into the media to talk about the UFO subject? And Bassett has no issue with aligning himself with this man? In the effort of getting the public to take this subject seriously, Stephen isn't doing himself any favors.<br /><br /> <br /> In the end, there is no UFO Information Police. We have to call these items out when we see them, and move on. Endlessly engaging in round-robin debates with the offenders isn't really productive, rational discourse is the last thing happening in those exchanges. I've been as guilty as anyone else when it comes to beating dead horses, sooner or later you learn to state your point, make the correction and move on. It&rsquo;s the only reasonable way to deal with an unreasonable situation.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1964962.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Second Eclipse Podcast Episode 4 - Jeremy Vaeni</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:04:11 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/6/30/second-eclipse-podcast-episode-4-jeremy-vaeni.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1955409</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>An evening with the inimitable <a href="http://www.cultureofcontact.com">Jeremy Vaeni</a>, where we discuss unusual coincidences, the visitors possible motives, and how to talk about the deeper levels of experience without sounding like a starry-eyed New Age believer.</p><p>Enjoy.</p><p><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/?h2dzjcj31m2">Episode 4 - Jeremy Vaeni&nbsp;</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1955409.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Second Eclipse Podcast Ep. 3 - My Better Half</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:59:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/6/24/second-eclipse-podcast-ep-3-my-better-half.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1942497</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Well, Jeremy Vaeni and I recorded (twice, due to assorted weird issues) on Saturday our interview, which was a hodgepodge of all matter of interesting "high strangeness" and matters of reality and perception - it might be hard to follow because I think we were all over the place....but it's good. </p><p>&nbsp;However I had no time to edit for inclusion into the 'cast this week, so I asked my wife if she'd consider doing a quick podcast with me - as you guys had asked for her. She's turned me down 2 times before, but said yes this time. I guess persistence pays off. She conveys her perceptions of one of the key events for me that we shared, and talks a bit about some of her own strange instance as a child...which she rarely does, so you guys are lucky. This is a broad overview where we touch upon a lot of stuff...it's just us talking about all this. There was so much to get into, and I hope we kept it simple enough to follow.<br></p><p>We're going to keep this as a download, as we're running tight on bandwidth...so just download from the link.&nbsp;</p><p>Enjoy.</p><p><a mce_real_href="http://www.mediafire.com/?dzdztw4ygds" href="http://www.mediafire.com/?dzdztw4ygds">Second Eclipse Podcast Episode 3&nbsp;</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1942497.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Podcast Episoides 1 and 2 Back Up</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:26:57 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/6/21/podcast-episoides-1-and-2-back-up.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1936031</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left"><img src="http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/storage/sitefiles/crashed.jpg" alt="crashed.jpg" /></span>Episodes 1 and 2 are now available in the <a href="http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/podcast-archive/">Podcast Archive</a> section of this site. <br /></p><p>The new episode will be up on Sunday still available as an on site player and download link. After each podcasts week is up, it will be removed from the blog area and posted in the archived podcasts section. Again, I apologize for the downtime. I'm currently looking for a way to get this into iTunes, so you can subscribe. More on that when available.<br /></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1936031.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Scientific American Article...</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:45:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/6/4/scientific-american-article.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1885144</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I found this really interesting, a little about the nature of perception and the brain....<a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=understanding-how-our-bra&print=true">click here</a><br /></p><p>&nbsp;Enjoy.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1885144.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Time to Walk.</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 08:04:51 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/5/28/time-to-walk.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1867923</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>One of my commonly held ideas in the study of the&nbsp; UFO problem is that in many cases, the enigma seems to manifest based on our own level interest and attention. This is not something I've been able to solidify, but it is an interesting item that others have identified with as well. <br />    <br />My experiences after the realization of what was going on with me personally, seemed to &quot;ramp up&quot; or become much more &quot;in my face&quot;. No longer was it a matter of thinking I saw something, it became undeniable. Initially I surmised I was just devoting too much time to it, and becoming entirely too sensitive. Don't ever assume you can't fool yourself, because no one is immune to that mistake. <br />    <br />However, in response to that notion, the enigma became gutsy enough to present more significant experiences to me, but also much more often in the presence of others (wife, friends, etc).&nbsp; Flashes of light, small ball shaped lights, floating geometric shapes, and apparition types have all been seen by family and friends over the years at one time or another. (David Biedny, on a visit not long ago, saw what he thought was a black cat walk down towards our hallway. We have no cat).<br />    <br />My wife has actually seen what she deems to be a transparent veil drift through the room on some occasions, mostly when I am writing or conversing, or investigating the UFO/alien subject rather intensely. Both of us back many years ago noticed a feeling around the house just before I would have a significant experience: we called it &quot;Doom&quot;. Almost as if you were being intensely watched, by something or someone not particularly happy with you. It's a seriously heady and heavy feeling, that others have noticed as well. <br />    <br />To skip to the point, when I dropped away from the pursuit of answers in this field around 10 years ago, the phenomena gradually ceased. There have been spotty events and sightings both seen by myself and family/friends, but there was a dramatic decrease in overall strangeness. I still studied the phenomena, but less intensity, and dare I say, obsession.<br />   <br />Not long before I walked away and secluded myself somewhat&nbsp; from this subject, I had an significant experience as I got ready for bed one night. I got up off the couch, got a final drink of water for the day and headed down the hallway to the bedroom.<br />   <br />It was 1 AM.<br /><br />I'd had an uneasy feeling earlier, but it wasn't too pronounced until I looked down the hallway, and there between me and the bedroom was an odd light, almost reddish. There was no obvious light source, only the light hitting the floor. This light, much like ones I'd seen before in childhood, visually canceled out everything past it. The door to the bedroom was no longer visible to me.<br />   <br />In that light, stood a being, very obviously not human. It was shorter then me (as near as I could tell) spindly, and moving as if it was underwater. I could not run, scream or look it in the face. My eyes dropped to the floor like a scolded child as the adrenalin slapped me in the chest and ankles. The cold numbing fear rose up my legs from my feet within seconds. There were smaller, shorter beings around this one. But they were not as solid or clear to my vision, but I could hear them moving on the carpet. Everything was completely silent aside from the scuffling.</p><div class="Ih2E3d"><br />   <br />The only thought in my mind was how to get to the bedroom and my wife. I remember thinking<br />&quot;How the hell am I going to get past this?&quot;<br /><br />Instantly I heard a scratchy voice right between my eyes: &quot;Just...walk.&quot;<br />    <br /></div>The next instant, I am aware of getting into bed with my heart pounding so hard I could feel it in the top of my head. I lay down and hear the clock in the living room chime: 4 AM. It was absolutely seamless, and three hours were gone. I woke my wife and told her what happened. We both commented the hallway and house smelled like musty paper, and the air was bristly feeling... hard to describe. Cold.<div class="Ih2E3d"><br />   <br />Hence where the name &quot;Walk&quot; comes from. Like walking past that would have been an easy feat.<br /><br /></div>This coming Friday, I will be heading to an area I know not very far from my home, where my wife, friends and I have all had significant sightings of very weird things in the sky. My realization event occurred there. I will be taking a digital camera, DVR, and a Hi-8 digital camcorder.<div class="Ih2E3d"><br />   <br />You're all going along.<br /><br /></div>Perhaps nothing will happen. Maybe something <span style="font-style: italic;">will</span> happen. If it does, I think we might possibly get a new perspective on how this phenomena might work. I'll go for several nights, and document each one. We should, from my past experience, see a gradual increase in odd activity over the duration of the multiple nights. <br /><div class="Ih2E3d">   <br />Or, maybe we won't.<br /><br />The results will be posted here on the site in their entirety. I'll also be carrying some equipment with me at all times of the day, so I'm prepared for any and all strangeness that might happen outside the hours I'll be actively looking.<br />   <br />The big question is will the enigma present itself, and if so, allow itself to be documented.<br /><br /></div>By focusing my intent, and actively searching for the enigma...will it come (as I have long suspected)? If nothing happens, so be it. Maybe I'm wrong. However, I've seen time after time in my life and in the lives of others, this very strange aspect of the UFO phenomenon.<div class="Ih2E3d"><br />  <br />I by no means claim this is true in every instance, for every person. There are most likely, random events. Perhaps those random events are like fishing poles, dropping into our water to see who bites. Take the bait and focus intent, and you're hooked. Once you're hooked, &quot;they&quot; obtain a window... through you. <br />  <br /></div>I know it's more then a little unsettling to think we have more to do with this enigma then we might have previously considered. That we through some mechanism we don't fully understand, open doors between them and us. The next part of that scenario is what happens when we do. Who are they, and what do they want? You have to assume they want something, or they wouldn't bother coming. Then there's how we perceive them, probably my biggest issue with the whole thing.<br />  <br />I recently heard someone talking on a radio or web program about the human brain, and that the brain does act in many ways like a dampening agent on our overall perception. That it filters outer reality so we can function without being overwhelmed. My thought, if that's true.. might be the source of my own fear. When confronted by this enigma, I feel a sense of &quot;hyper reality&quot;. I cannot adequately describe it, other then being overwhelmingly aware far past the point of it being tolerable. It's downright frightening. But around these beings, it's par for the course... and it makes them very hard to be around. &quot;Hyper-reality&quot;, seems to make everything... the air, sounds, vision... all hone down to such ridiculous clarity, it's as if you're seeing the world as it really exists for the first time. All of it. At once.<div class="Ih2E3d"><br />  <br />You're there. They are too. And you don't want to be, but there's no way out of it. I always equated it to something they do. But maybe it isn't. Perhaps it's a by-product of them being here, as if somehow they bring a bit of their environment with them, and you're in it as well. I don't know...and really? There's no way to describe it unless you've been there. <br />  <br /></div><p>It's also incredibly surrealistic. There are very deep things I could describe here of the feeling, but I'll leave it for another time... suffice it to say these beings can see, and touch you in places and in ways no one on this planet ever could (insert your favorite anal probe joke here). As if they reach into the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">real</span> you. Not the one the world sees, or the mask you put on to face the public everyday... the <span style="font-style: italic;">you</span>, that you barely acknowledge in daily life. Much more the you, that you were as a child when everything was new. Do you believe we lose innocence? I don't think we do, I tend to think we build walls around it, and then we seem to forget that part of us.<br />  <br />So, no... Jeff doesn't think this is all about little green men (or taupe, if you prefer) in spaceships. If you're completely married to that notion, then none of what I say is likely to make any sense to you. I don't rule out the ETH, but I really see no evidence for it. What I've seen is a research community that routinely doesn't want to acknowledge these very significant and strange parts of the subject, probably because they don't know where to go with it, or because it could negate their aggressively defended theories they've sold to the public at large. It's also so incredibly weird, that they assume the public just won't accept the idea. I don't know when these people will realize their theories are not a commodity to be sold to others as the reality of the matter at hand. I don't think the easy answer is going to apply to this complex of a subject.<br /><br />One that can exist on the edge of our perception, or manifest to hyper-reality.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1867923.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Eerie Radio...</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:31:31 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/5/27/eerie-radio.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1866479</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left"><img src="http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/storage/sitefiles/eeriebanner.jpg" alt="eeriebanner.jpg" /></span>Did a spot on the Eerie Radio Show this past Sunday, which you can check out at: <a href="http://www.eerieradio.com">www.eerieradio.com</a></p><p>Many thanks to the good people at Eerie Radio for having me on, and for letting me extend the time limit. ;)</p><p>I'm sure I got into several things that will piss the mainstream off but, what else is new.&nbsp; Enjoy.<br /></p><a href="http://www.eerieradio.com"></a>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1866479.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Derry UFO Photo-Not What It Seems</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 06:20:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/5/21/derry-ufo-photo-not-what-it-seems.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1852935</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Analysis of the Derry UFO photo is posted in <a href="http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/current-cases-and-analysis/">Current Cases</a> Section, have a look. Enjoy. <br /></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1852935.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Just Walk.</title><dc:creator>Jeff Ritzmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:51:50 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/2008/5/14/just-walk.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">218322:2152439:1837230</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that I've been so spotty with my posts here, but as usual life has gotten in the way and sucked the time right away from me. Finally work has simmered a bit and my sleep habits are starting to even out. I've been up writing til 2 and 3 am just about every night for 2 weeks on the book so I'm caught up a bit from where I didn't get anything done.<br /><br />I've been thinking seriously about the project I'm doing in league with Jeremy Vaeni's Culture of Contact, so I want to give essentially a little overview of what's going to happen with it.<br /><br />I have said for many years that this enigma (UFOs) seem to manifest for me and others based somewhat on the amount of time devoted to the subject in intense pondering, or thought. This is not to go the route of getting yourself so hyper sensitive or even paranoid that every light or odd thing seen or experienced is the enigma, but that undeniable events seem to occur, and not just for me but those around me.<br /><br />Largely this hasn't been accepted nor studied by mainstream UFO research. However, many have noticed it and if you're an experiencer, you know exactly what I mean. <br /><br />This is one thing UFOlogy doesn't want to talk much about (as most are too obsessed and married to theories with hybrid breeding programs and regression hypnotherapy)...I feel this could be a possible clue as to the potential nature of the phenomenon and cannot be ignored. <br /><br />Several weeks ago now, I became intensely interested in the Dorothy Izatt case. I must have watched the documentary 10 times and became fascinated with her account of the experience's changeling effect based on her mindset. (i.e. negative experiences when she became suspicious or frightened about the enigma, and more benign when she centered her thoughts towards curiosity rather then fear.) <br /><br />There it is again. Tailored to expectation.<br /><br />By the way, while engrossed in her case, my wife and I had a sighting of a pearlish silver ball going over the house next door...during daylight and undeniably something very weird. I remember my wife saying &quot;ok maybe you need to back off&quot;. She's personally seen this &quot;the more you give the more you get&quot; scenario happen many times. I also had 2 more significant events during that period I'll discuss later.<br /><br />I have not had a full blown experience per se in almost 10 years. I also have not entrenched myself as deeply in the subject as I was back at that time. My experiences ceased (which began at approx. age 5) by disassociating myself with the subject almost completely. I read no books, watched damned few documentaries, and didn't ponder on the subject much if at all. In essence I denied it to myself. From myself.<br /><br />So, if I dug myself in again, would it return. If it did, could I document it in any way? Would it mean anything if I did?<br /><br />That's the idea. More later tonight, stay tuned.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesecondeclipse.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-1837230.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>